Hiding Income? Why the 3-Year Limit Won’t Save You from Retroactive Child Support (2026 Case Update)
Ontario courts order retroactive child support beyond the three-year limit if a parent hides income. The 2026 decision in Odigie v. Egharevba confirms that blameworthy conduct and lifestyle evidence allow judges to look back much further to ensure fairness.
OMNI LAW GROUP
WE SECURE YOUR CHILD’S FINANCIAL FUTURE
PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS & PROVEN RESULTS
905-497-7200
THE THREE-YEAR RULE IS NOT AN ABSOLUTE SHIELD
Many parents believe the "three-year rule" is a hard deadline. They think that if they underpay child support, the court can only look back 36 months. This is a mistake. The 2026 case of Odigie v. Egharevba (2026 ONSC 3024) serves as a stark warning for anyone attempting to diminish their true earnings. In this ruling, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice made it clear: if you hide income, the timeline expands.
Our team at OMNI LAW GROUP sees these cases often at the Davis Courthouse in Brampton. Parents try to rely on the D.B.S. v. S.R.G. framework, which suggests a three-year presumptive limit for retroactive support. However, that limit is a guideline, not a statute. It is designed to provide certainty for parents who act in good faith. It is not a loophole for those who intentionally mislead the other parent or the court.
If a parent fails to disclose a raise, hides business revenue, or "lulls" the recipient into a false sense of security, they are engaging in blameworthy conduct. In Odigie, the court found that the payor's failure to be honest about their true financial picture justified a retroactive award that stretched far beyond the typical three-year window.
How do I file for child support at the Davis Courthouse in Brampton?
Filing for support starts with an Application or a Motion to Change. You must file these documents at the A. Grenville and William Davis Courthouse at 7755 Hurontario Street. Our office at North Park Drive is just minutes away from this location.
The process involves serving the other party and filing a Financial Statement. This document is the most critical part of your case. It requires full and frank disclosure. If you are the recipient, you must show that you made "effective notice": meaning you clearly asked for a support adjustment when circumstances changed. If you are the payor, you must prove that your declared income matches your actual lifestyle.
Courthouse security lines can be long, especially on Tuesday mornings when family motions are frequent. We recommend arriving at least 45 minutes before your scheduled appearance. If you are dealing with the intersection of Criminal Defence and Family Law: such as a case involving Peel Regional Police and domestic allegations: having a coordinated strategy is vital.
THE POWER OF LIFESTYLE EVIDENCE IN 2026
When tax returns do not tell the whole story, the court looks at how a person lives. This is known as lifestyle evidence. In Odigie v. Egharevba, the court relied on this to impute income. If a parent claims to earn $50,000 but drives a $100,000 car and takes multiple international vacations, the math does not add up.
We at OMNI LAW GROUP help clients use "lifestyle evidence" to expose hidden income. This includes:
Bank statements showing large cash deposits.
Social media posts showing luxury purchases or travel.
Evidence of asset accumulation (real estate or investments) that exceeds declared earnings.
Corporate records where personal expenses are run through a business.
The court has the power to ignore the number on line 15000 of your tax return. Instead, a judge can "impute" a higher income based on what you should be earning or what your spending suggests you are earning. This is especially relevant for self-employed individuals in Brampton and Orangeville. If you suspect your ex-partner is hiding assets, you should read our guide on Hiding Income.
Can a court look back more than 3 years for child support?
Yes. The court will exceed the three-year guideline if there is blameworthy conduct. The Odigie decision reinforces that the child's right to support is paramount. If a parent's actions prevented the child from receiving the correct amount of support earlier, the court will correct that unfairness, regardless of how many years have passed.
Blameworthy conduct includes:
Intentionally hiding a salary increase.
Providing misleading financial statements.
Pressure or intimidation to prevent the other parent from seeking support.
Using complex corporate structures to shield income from the Family Lawyer in Brampton or the court.
In 2026, the technology used by the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) and local agencies like Peel Children’s Aid Society (CAS) has become more integrated. It is harder to hide than it used to be.
2026 FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT TABLE UPDATES
The 2026 Federal Child Support Table Updates have adjusted the monthly amounts to reflect current inflation and the cost of living in Ontario. These tables are the law. They are not suggestions. When income is imputed based on lifestyle evidence, the new 2026 tables are applied to that higher figure.
For families in Peel Region and Dufferin County, these updates mean that even a small increase in income can result in a significant change in monthly support. If you have not reviewed your child support order in the last two years, it is likely outdated.
WE ANALYZE YOUR FINANCES
WE EXPOSE HIDDEN ASSETS
WE WIN COMPLEX MOTIONS
905-497-7200
NAVIGATING THE BRAMPTON AND ORANGEVILLE COURTS
Legal matters do not happen in a vacuum. Often, a family law dispute over child support coincides with criminal charges. We focus on the intersection of Criminal Defence and Family Law to ensure one case does not sabotage the other.
Whether you are appearing at the Davis Courthouse or the Orangeville Courthouse, local logistics matter. Knowing the preferences of local judges and the procedural requirements of the Peel Med-Arb process can change the outcome of your case. Our North Park Drive office provides a central hub for clients across the GTA who need a one-stop legal solution.
Quick Facts: Retroactive Child Support in Ontario
The 3-Year Guideline: It is a starting point, not a hard limit.
Effective Notice: Support usually starts from the date you clearly asked for it.
Blameworthy Conduct: This removes the 3-year cap and allows for longer retroactive periods.
Lifestyle Evidence: Courts can use your spending habits to prove your real income.
2026 Tables: All new support calculations must use the 2026 Federal Child Support Table Updates.
Local Legal FAQ
How does blameworthy conduct affect my case in Brampton?
In Brampton, judges at the Davis Courthouse take a dim view of parents who hide income. If the court finds blameworthy conduct, such as failing to disclose a new job or hiding business profits, they will likely order support back to the date the income changed, even if it was five or ten years ago. This often includes an order for the payor to pay the recipient’s legal costs. Our team focuses on gathering the necessary evidence: like corporate filings and lifestyle records: to prove these claims in court.
What if my ex-partner is self-employed and hides cash?
Self-employment is common in Brampton and Orangeville, but it does not give a parent a "free pass" on child support. We use the Child Support Guidelines to ask the court to impute income. We look at the gross revenue of the business and common industry standards. If their personal lifestyle (mortgage payments, luxury vehicles, travel) exceeds their reported income, the court in 2026 is increasingly willing to set a "fair" income level that reflects reality rather than just what is on their tax return.
Can I stop a retroactive claim if I didn't know my income went up?
Ignorance of the law is rarely a defence. Every parent has an ongoing obligation to ensure their support payments are correct based on their actual income. If your income increased significantly and you did not inform the other parent, the court may view this as blameworthy conduct. However, if the recipient waited an unreasonable amount of time to ask for more money despite knowing your income increased, we can argue "undue hardship" or "prejudicial delay" to limit the retroactive amount.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rahul Kaushal is the Co-founder of OMNI LAW GROUP. As an experienced lawyer and a member in good standing with the Law Society of Ontario (LSO), Rahul focuses on navigating the complex intersection of Family Law and Criminal Defence. Along with Co-founder Vaneet Sangha, Rahul has built OMNI LAW GROUP into a one-stop legal solution for individuals and families in Brampton, Orangeville, and across the Greater Toronto Area. He frequently represents clients at the A. Grenville and William Davis Courthouse, providing dedicated and practical legal strategies for high-stakes litigation.
OMNI LAW GROUP
Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM
905-497-7200
www.omnilawfirm.ca